Regardless of any skepticism this concept has been noted of growing over the years, and of course this is very beneficial to the economy and the government. In return the government has offered better protection for whistleblowers over the years but can they replace the guilt factor involved. It’s very evident that reporting wrong doing at work is not easy; people do not enjoy causing ruckus and making a mess. They may feel threatened of losing their job, they may fear loss of friendship, or it may simply just go against what they believe in. It may be difficult to overcome these issues, but in the end the best decision is the one in which the positives outweigh the negatives. Other than suggesting whistle blowing because it is the right thing to do, there are many other fruits of honesty that come along. 
Reporting wrongdoing is tough and knowing that it’s going on and not doing anything about it is tougher. Living with guilt is not ideal especially if you’re not involved and even if you are there is always a chance to step back. Making such a decision will not only subsidize your guilt but by doing the right thing it will empower others in such a situation to come out and report wrongdoing.
Whistle blowing can help all future employees with this issue in making it easier for them to justify a similar issue. The government for such reporting may provide full support and possibly money. Over the years whistle blowing laws have gotten much better in terms of protection for the long-term. Depending on various circumstances of the case, including winning it, the government will provide a financial windfall to help make amends with the destruction caused to you in any way due to your employer’s fraudulent actions. It’s evident that laws encourage whistle blowing; special status in our legislation is provided for such behavior.
Although the fruits of whistle blowing may seem enticing, there are certain drawbacks that make it very difficult to do. Whistle blowers are often times labeled; this is a type of label that can take its effects on a career. Although prospect employers may value a whistle blowers beliefs and trust, the only thing that should matter to them is skill. Whistle blowers are bound to face some sort of retaliation, accusing someone usually does not come with flowers and chocolates. It may be as serious as getting fired or even a transfer. There are laws that protect whistle blowers from retaliation but employers still do it. Legal action costs a lot of money and moving from lawyer to lawyer is very expensive. One of the worst drawbacks of doing the right thing is financial destruction. Until the case is won, dilution in ones finances may occur, as it will prove to be very expensive to fund. Although this may be such a setback one thing for sure is that when the legal case is won, expect justice to be served in all ways.
http://www.corporatecomplianceinsights.com/5-rewards-and-drawbacks-of-being-a-whistleblower/
A Great Recent Example
Related articles
- Snowden: Greater Threat to Whistle-Blowing than to the Government (jimleff.blogspot.com)
- Whistleblowers (psychologytoday.com)
- UK forgets ethics, mulls whistleblower rewards (fcpablog.com)
- Mafialeaks: The anonymous whistle-blowing site inspired by Wikileaks which aims (wikileaks-forum.com)
Business Ethics and Morals 